Build date

Discussion of TABC-related matters
Post Reply
User avatar
Brent
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2014 7:57 am

Build date

Post by Brent » Mon Jul 21, 2014 8:03 am

How do I know the exact build date for TC 9608 XPAC 10,315 late 1949. Has all plates and tags etc..
Thanks, Bent

User avatar
Bill Ritson
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2013 8:09 am

Re: Build date

Post by Bill Ritson » Tue Jul 22, 2014 12:00 pm

John James' website, (ttypes.org/ttt2/) has a T type database. It puts your car at 8/9 September 1949. There are no surviving factory records.

User avatar
Henry Pang
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 12:45 pm
Location: Mercer Island Washington USA

Re: Build date

Post by Henry Pang » Tue Jul 22, 2014 9:43 pm

Here is your build date. You can go to http://www.tregister.org for more information.

Henry,
TC7784
Washington
Attachments
TC9608.JPG
TC9608.JPG (33.79 KiB) Viewed 4044 times

User avatar
Gene Gillam
Posts: 1275
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:52 pm
Location: Saucier, MS

Re: Build date

Post by Gene Gillam » Thu Jul 24, 2014 9:41 am

Does anyone know if that date gives month first or date first, i.e., 06-09-1949 could be June 9th, 1949 or 6 Sept 1949. Aren't the British a 180 degrees out from the USA when giving dates?

User avatar
Steve Simmons
Site Admin
Posts: 2738
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 10:48 am
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: Build date

Post by Steve Simmons » Thu Jul 24, 2014 9:59 am

Yes, it should translate to the 6th of September.
1949 TC8975 / XPAG 9609
1948 TC6011 / XPEG1182 (XPAG6472)
http://www.mgnuts.com

i.thomson
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 10:16 am

Re: Build date

Post by i.thomson » Mon Aug 11, 2014 2:50 am

Gene, it is the USA who are 180degrees out. After all our way goes from the smallest to the largest, day/month/year which is surely the logical way to do it?

Regards
Ian Thomson
Notts. UK

User avatar
Gene Gillam
Posts: 1275
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:52 pm
Location: Saucier, MS

Re: Build date

Post by Gene Gillam » Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:56 pm

That is pretty damn logical, Ian!

Post Reply