MG TC Stage 2 Wood Frame Build Cont.
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2017 1:47 am
I've just started out on my new season of my TC restoration. The first, and probably most difficult, item on the things to do list this year is to complete the stage 2 wood frame build as defined in TC Forever. I want to be sure that I have the curve of the top of the rear wheel arch wood right so I have gathered some measurements with the aid of some of the good people on here and I have also put the old wood wheel arch back on my car. I'm also hoping to get permission off a local museum to take some measurements off their totally original TC. Pictures and progress reports to follow, but for now, a quick question/observation:
Page 175 of TC Forever gives a dimension of 41 3/4" for the measurement across the inside of the body at 3.5" forward of the back of the body. Measurement off my old wood and measurements from two people on this forum gives a consistent answer which is 1/3" to 1/2" wider than this (8mm to 12mm). This makes me wonder a) if the dimension in TCFE is in error (should be say 42 1/8") and/or b) how accurately were these frames actually build in the factory - are all of these measurements within what they built to anyway?
At the moment, I'm planning on building to my original wood dimensions (1/3" wider at this point). Am I worrying too much about relatively small differences in my pursuit of accuracy?
Thoughts please...
Page 175 of TC Forever gives a dimension of 41 3/4" for the measurement across the inside of the body at 3.5" forward of the back of the body. Measurement off my old wood and measurements from two people on this forum gives a consistent answer which is 1/3" to 1/2" wider than this (8mm to 12mm). This makes me wonder a) if the dimension in TCFE is in error (should be say 42 1/8") and/or b) how accurately were these frames actually build in the factory - are all of these measurements within what they built to anyway?
At the moment, I'm planning on building to my original wood dimensions (1/3" wider at this point). Am I worrying too much about relatively small differences in my pursuit of accuracy?
Thoughts please...