TC 6710 not real good in the snow!

Discussion of TABC-related matters
Post Reply
User avatar
Norman Golm
Posts: 103
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 7:22 pm
Location: Northport Mi

TC 6710 not real good in the snow!

Post by Norman Golm » Sun Feb 17, 2013 11:34 am

Thought the following pictures might be fun for all of you. The body tub should be back from the painter mid March. Painting it 1989 Jaguar British Racing Green. Power painted the chassis components to protect them from the salt!
Attachments
DSCN0132 small.jpg
DSCN0130 small.jpg
Norman Golm
12158 N Foxview Dr
Northport, Mi., USA
ncgolm@gmail.com

User avatar
Steve Simmons
Site Admin
Posts: 2737
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 10:48 am
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: TC 6710 not real good in the snow!

Post by Steve Simmons » Sun Feb 17, 2013 12:05 pm

Just couldn't wait for the body, eh? I don't blame you. But you sure don't look very warm!
1949 TC8975 / XPAG 9609
1948 TC6011 / XPEG1182 (XPAG6472)
http://www.mgnuts.com

User avatar
David Edgar
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2012 8:44 pm
Location: El Cajon, California

Re: TC 6710 not real good in the snow!

Post by David Edgar » Mon Feb 18, 2013 12:36 pm

Norman, what a kick. Love it. Can you actually drive the chassis that way or was the chassis just pushed out of the garage? From the tire marks in the snow it looks as if it was rolled back. I do not see foot prints to the side, only a couple in front. None the less, a great photo and with permission would like to run in our TC Motoring Guild newsletter next month. I can send you a copy too.
David Edgar, 1948 TC 5108 / XPAG 5801
Owned since November 1967

User avatar
Gene Gillam
Posts: 1275
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:52 pm
Location: Saucier, MS

Re: TC 6710 not real good in the snow!

Post by Gene Gillam » Mon Feb 18, 2013 2:34 pm

I think the condition of the wiring harness at the voltage regulator should answer the "driven" or "pushed" question. But to be honest, until you asked I *assumed* it was driven.

User avatar
Norman Golm
Posts: 103
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 7:22 pm
Location: Northport Mi

Re: TC 6710 not real good in the snow!

Post by Norman Golm » Wed Feb 20, 2013 1:31 pm

The chassis is totally operational this particular day I only backed it out of the garage but a month ago when the snow disappeared for a few days I drove it about three miles in our subdivision. It is equipped with an instrument panel (one gauge) off and on switch and a wire to pull the solenoid in . There is also a gas tank strapped on. I could probably compete in a race. See photos attached. You are free to use the photos as you please. In fact I would be honored if you did :)
Attachments
DSCN0134 small.jpg
IMG_1817 small.jpg
Norman Golm
12158 N Foxview Dr
Northport, Mi., USA
ncgolm@gmail.com

Peter Roberts
Posts: 739
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 12:08 pm
Location: Connecticut

Re: TC 6710 not real good in the snow!

Post by Peter Roberts » Thu Feb 21, 2013 9:40 am

Did you really paint the sump red? My body shop is now removing the green paint they sprayed on mine without asking.


No, no, no, am not an OP! Just noticed it. If you like it, do keep it.

Peter in CT
TC0604
_Peter

User avatar
John R McNarry
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:06 am
Location: Alexander Manitoba Canada
Contact:

Re: TC 6710 not real good in the snow!

Post by John R McNarry » Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:18 am

My TC 6338 looked the same only assembled by a 15 year old kid (me) in 1966. dad caught me driving it and put it away. It stayed put away until just a few years ago when I restored it.

It sure was hard to resist driving it back then!

keep on having fun!

User avatar
John R McNarry
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:06 am
Location: Alexander Manitoba Canada
Contact:

Re: TC 6710 not real good in the snow!

Post by John R McNarry » Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:20 am

Curious about your shock absorbers. Can you tell us more?

John Youens
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2013 12:51 pm
Location: Magnolia, Texas
Contact:

Re: TC 6710 not real good in the snow!

Post by John Youens » Thu Apr 18, 2013 2:16 pm

Looks like a blast! I have to wonder how the performance would be in a stripped-down chassis like this. :thumbs:

John

John Youens
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2013 12:51 pm
Location: Magnolia, Texas
Contact:

Re: TC 6710 not real good in the snow!

Post by John Youens » Thu Apr 18, 2013 2:29 pm

Peter Roberts wrote:Did you really paint the sump red? My body shop is now removing the green paint they sprayed on mine without asking.


No, no, no, am not an OP! Just noticed it. If you like it, do keep it.

Peter in CT
TC0604
To quote from "The T Type Restoration Handbook" published by The New England MG T Register, and edited by Dick Knudson:

"On many engines the cast aluminum sump, timing chain cover and clutch housing seem to have been painted block color, but in at least a few cases they are known to have been left unpainted. Many restorers prefer not to paint them, and most people agree that they look better bare."

As time goes on, I think the bare sump is becoming much more popular and is therefore becoming the standard. However, it appears that this was not always the case. Just for the record, one of my TCs has a painted sump, the other is bare. As Peter said, the painted sump was also an issue of the engine builder not asking which way I wanted it...

John

Post Reply